Saturday, June 9, 2012

June 9: Prometheus (2012 -- Ridley Scott)

★★★
Prometheus is a very different movie from Alien.  A lot of fans are complaining that Prometheus takes on so much explanatory detail that it is confusing and ultimately doesn’t make sense. And that all the detail dilutes the thrills.  I wouldn’t totally disagree with that opinion, but if you just look at the broad brushstrokes, this is still a fun summer movie with outstanding special effects.

The visuals are very well thought out and wonderful to watch in 3D.  Prometheus has the same vast scale of Alien, the same claustrophobia, and the same stark lighting.  Dusty scenes that are cut through with searchlights and flashlights create depth and scale and give the visuals a plausible feel. There are quotes and echoes of Alien throughout. The angular bulkheads of the first movie look familiar here, and so do the helmeted spacesuits with their camera feeds and interior lights.  

On the other hand, transparent circuit boards seem to have replaced the tubes and wires of the older film, and this small difference in design points to the large difference in the two movies: Alien is a simple horror flic that uses its sets to add to the viewers’ tension, while Prometheus has moved away from horror in pursuit of larger sci-fi themes.  Unfortunately, it’s this move toward greater sci-fi that complicates and ultimately undercuts the film.

Seen in a large perspective, Prometheus starts with a slow development and gets more and more intense as the stakes and the violence rise.  A lot like Alien.  But Prometheus also becomes more dilute as it adds layers of complication like the subplot of Weyland appearing on the Prometheus and the seemingly gratuitous references to Lawrence of Arabia (and why was Charlise Theron’s character even in the movie?).  But the more the dilution increases, the more the film loses energy and coherence.  If you eventually begin to question the motivation for some of the actions in the film, Prometheus loses the amiable unity you’re willing to grant it in pursuit of your cinematic thrills, and you have to resort to thinking that you liked it despite it's finer incoherence, which is my conclusion.

Prometheus might be on the path to becoming the poster movie for those postmodern film theorists who say films don’t need to be coherent to be good.  Michael Bay regularly puts together incoherent action scenes to create chases and fights, but Prometheus does this on a larger scale by putting characters and events together without the tight logic of a traditional story.  But whether postmodern or just badly scripted, with its great visuals and larger story structure, Prometheus is still a fun way to spend a couple of summer hours.  



Friday, June 8, 2012

June 8: Alien (1979 -- Ridley Scott)

★★★★
With Prometheus looming in the very near future, Carlos suggested revisiting Ridley Scott’s original Alien, so I watched that film for the first time since 1979.  It still has impact, though thankfully I wasn’t as jittery after this viewing as I was after my first.  And I hadn't realized how influential this film has been; I recognized many elements in it that I see regularly in today’s thrillers.

This time through, I realized that the movie is more a thriller with an outer space setting than a hard-core sci-fi flic.  Scott combines the two genres by using the vastness of space, contrasty lighting, and claustrophobic quarters stuffed with lots of cables/hoses/wires/technogear to create the tension and dread in the mind of the viewers that we expect from thrillers.  It's a smart, original use of the sci-fi setting we expect.  The story of Alien starts slowly, introducing us to the tight, dark Nostromo and its squabbling, human crew, and when the close-ups and tight quarters have us breathing a little hard for air, we visit an alien ship that’s disturbingly organic (gold star for HR Giger’s design) and thus get introduced to a yet another element of tension.  Of course, shortly after the tension jacks up with the visit, the alien gets loose on the Nostromo, the pace picks up, and the movie never looks back.

I've seen a lot about the economy of this film, and Scott does indeed focus on his storytelling and on our thrills while watching it.  Alien has practically no exposition: We don’t know anyone’s background or the reasons for their behavior, and we don’t know much about the ship, its stated mission or the ulterior motives of the company.  We don’t know anything about the alien and how it mutates either.  And we don’t need to.  Alien is a scary movie, and all we need to know is that the characters are in real danger from a very bad enemy.  The movie works in a pure cinema space of frame, light, set design, sound, story and acting, and it’s this pure cinema that Scott masters to scare the pants off us.