This is a wonderful little movie that brings the specificity
and honesty that small film seems to be able to muster more easily than our
summer blockbusters. It’s billed as a
romance and has a little the feel of Brief Encounter or Before Sunrise, but
Weekend’s romance is mostly the catalyst for change that the two well-wrought
characters experience. It’s a unique,
touching and truthful portrayal.
The center of the film is the characters, and Haigh develops
them with a compelling specificity.
Russell is out but not open about himself with those around him, and he
compartmentalizes his various experiences and feelings as a way of fitting
in. He’s uncomfortable with public
expressions of male affection since that could result in social rejection, and
he always hides the details of his gay experience from his straight best friend
who, we find out, actually wants his friend to be more honest with him. Haigh expresses Russell’s longing to connect
in other details, too. Russell furnishes
his apartment with pre-owned items, making up stories about the connection
people might’ve had to his tea cup, and the only space Russell is completely honest
is when he’s writing alone on his laptop.
When we learn the details of Russell’s background, we can better
understand his desire for connection and difficulty in connecting—Russell grew
up as a state ward.
The garrulous Glen, on the other hand, maintains his
distance from people by throwing up a big, extroverted wall of talk and
posturing. Right after his first night
with Russell, he begins to externalize the experience by recording Russell’s
impressions of the night for an art project.
Glen’s angry, in-your-face activism lets him politicize and abstract the
pain we later learn he feels; details like his shouting into a courtyard
fourteen stories below him show the intensity of his feeling if not the real
object. At his going away party, Glen is
loud with his friends but not warm, and Russell learns they don’t feel they
know Glen well. Weekend develops both
characters with an exceptional amount of real, specific detail.
The film uses the love story between the two men to motivate
their respective character changes, and it’s the specific details here, too,
that mark their changing relationship.
Russell is open with Glen from the beginning, but as Glen leaves
Saturday morning, Russell thinks the encounter is just another entry on his
laptop. However, Russell has been feeling
increasingly isolated – which we see in details like the opening scene with his
friends and in the lunch scene with his friends – and after a day of
life-guarding and watching life at the pool from the outside, he texts
Glen. Glen shows up, a significant
gesture for the closed character, and the two spend a day together. As Glen leaves later, he makes an move outside himself and invites Russell to his going away party; Glen sliding a hoodie over his
head is an external expression of how vulnerable the invitation is making him
feel. As Weekend progresses, the more
they talk with each other, the more the two men reveal and the more their love
develops. By the end of the film,
Russell has opened enough to trust his straight friend Jamie with the details
of what’s been going on in his life, and Russell opens up enough to try to
catch Glen at the station. For his part,
Glen has opened up enough to break down in tears at Russell’s gesture, and
Russell is open enough to kiss him in public.
As a last detail to mark Glen’s change, he gives Russell the tape he
made on the first morning they awoke, honoring their relationship by not having
played it for anyone and not keeping it.
It’s a touching detail.
And for all the engagement with the characters that Weekend
creates, the film’s visuals are also a big part of
what draws us into the movie and keeps us there. The local specifics make this film real. There are trips on public transportation, a trip to a fair, and visits to locations like the pool and apartment complex that give the film so much of its authenticity. While real, these same locations become cinematic expressions in the camera of Ula Pontikos. The natatorium is dressed out in cinematic primary colors, and the buildings of Russell’s apartment block have a gray uniformity that echoes the lives of Russell and Glen. As their love grows, an external building shot shows a light in Russell’s apartment alone, a metaphor for their spot of life in the complex of gray buildings. Pontikos also uses artificial light to good effect in exteriors, especially in the fun, garish shots of the fair and an Edward Hopper-esque gas station.
what draws us into the movie and keeps us there. The local specifics make this film real. There are trips on public transportation, a trip to a fair, and visits to locations like the pool and apartment complex that give the film so much of its authenticity. While real, these same locations become cinematic expressions in the camera of Ula Pontikos. The natatorium is dressed out in cinematic primary colors, and the buildings of Russell’s apartment block have a gray uniformity that echoes the lives of Russell and Glen. As their love grows, an external building shot shows a light in Russell’s apartment alone, a metaphor for their spot of life in the complex of gray buildings. Pontikos also uses artificial light to good effect in exteriors, especially in the fun, garish shots of the fair and an Edward Hopper-esque gas station.
The cinematography and editing also create great
intimacy. Pontikos is comfortable in
extreme close-ups of the two leads, and we respond to the actors as real people,
complete with pimples and messy hair.
Narrow depth of field, too, adds to the sense of intimacy and engages
our eye in the film as our gaze moves from the strip of face that is in focus
to the rest of the image that isn’t. And
Pontikos indulges our cinematic voyeurism as we scan the bodies of the actors,
coming to know them as only their most intimate acquaintances would. Haigh has said that he wanted a gay male or a
female as a cinematographer so the camera might be more intimate with the male
actors. And while the cinematography is
breaching the distance between us and the characters, encouraging us to connect
with them, the direction is providing great, long takes that have the span of
real conversation. The cinematic here
lends even more authenticity to the characters and their movement.
Weekend even has a little of the meta- in it. Early on, Glen says that gay art will never
be popular because the majority straight world isn’t interested in gay life or,
especially, gay love. It’s not hard to
imagine Haigh behind that script line, wittily commenting on the barriers to a
wide reception his Weekend will face.
And more’s the pity that Haigh was right. Too few people heard about Weekend and even
fewer saw it. But with its specificity
of characters, specificity of locale and even specificity of gayness, Weekend
is a universal portrayal of two people trying to overcoming their social
isolation through love. It’s a story the
movies have been telling for a long time if with a different vocabulary.